The article was really interesting. Being a person who does
not really like being outdoors. I find comfort in structure and safety of the
classroom environment. To this extent, I had not realized how Eurocentric ideas
can be expressed and be influential even in the structure of building
themselves. I see buildings as mainly “a place that keeps me from being too hot
or too cold” and not as a social construct that influences us on a deep
intellectual level. Although like the structure and order of the classroom, my
preferred organizational method is order in chaos. It might look messy to you,
but I know exactly where I left everything. In my teaching, I hope to foster
the idea that there are different forms of learning and understanding and one
is not necessarily better than another. One key aspect of being in the outdoor
classroom is that we would no longer be bound by constructs of a classroom and
therefore have the freedom to explore other ways of knowing and coming to
different levels and types of understanding than we would in the classroom. As
the article states, the garden classroom allows students to be more reflective
and learn from more senses than the mostly visual delivery of the regular
classroom setting. One metaphor that resonated with was the ideas of classroom
as parkour or like swing music. As teachers we often need to go with the flow
and within the structures of school, teach in a way that suits the needs of
ourselves and our students. I’m not sure if there is anything I really disagree
with the article though I don’t know if I would put such importance into the
structure of school governing the mindset of the people that work within them.
Perhaps I’m not as progressive as some but I take comfort in tradition and
structure and although I am willing to try new approaches to teaching as it
might be best to support my students.
No comments:
Post a Comment